The possibility of selling your home is via a joint, sole or multi-agent contract. What are the costs of each option and which can lead to a faster selling?
Types of estate agency agreements:
Sole agency agreement
A sole agency agreement occurs when you sign an exclusive agreement with one estate Knutsford estate agent for selling your house. In the time period of the contract you’ll be tied to the agent you choose.
The length of contracts typically ranges in length between 2 and 5 months. The three-month period is the normal marketing timeframe, but you are able to negotiate. You may also have an opportunity to notice.
Estate agents usually charge a fee of between 1and 2 percent (plus the VAT) of the sale price of a sole-agency.
Multi-agency agreement
A multi-agency agreement (also called multi-agency) allows you to employ any number of agents you wish to market your property simultaneously. The duration of the contract and commission rate may differ between agents. You may also contract that include other agents at any point.
The fees are only paid to the agent who ultimately locates the buyer.
Fees for multiple agencies are usually 2.5 percent to 3.5 percent (plus the VAT). The higher rate is justified by the fact that a single agent has a lower chance of closing the deal.
A Joint Sole Agency Agreement
Somewhat of a hybrid between sole and multi-agency joint-sole-agency occurs the case when at least two agents are able to sell your home concurrently. Agents and brokers share each other’s commission in case of a sale regardless of the agent who discovered the buyer.
The fees for joint-sole agencies are usually between 2% and 2.5 percent (plus the VAT).
Clauses that are obnoxious
As with all legal contracts it is important to be sure to read the conditions and terms carefully. Sharp practices of estate agents are not as widespread as some may suggest. But, it’s possible to get caught by clauses that are typically negotiated when you are able to identify them:
Sole selling rights
There is no need to pay any commissions to the agent in the event that you locate your own buyer within the period of contract.
However, certain sole agency agreements contain the’sole selling rights clause. In this case, you’d be required to pay the commission of the agent in the event that you accept an offer from a buyer, regardless of whether an agent introduced you to the purchaser to you or not.
On the surface this may seem unfair. Estate agents may claim that they have performed the entire work and should be entitled to their fees. Certain sole selling rights clauses permit for a 50% commission that is payable to the estate agent in the event that you discover the buyer yourself.
It is usually possible to bargain to get this clause removed when you discuss it to the representative.
Continuing liability
Although it’s not usual Some agents have a clause ‘future liability’ that can result in having to pay commissions twice.
If you end your contract with agent A, and then sell to Agent B B could claim that they brought the buyer to them and is entitled to their commission. In this case you could be required to pay commissions to agent A as well as agent B.
The term “introduced” is vague when it comes to legal definitions. Agent A could claim that it introduced the purchaser, but they only give the potential buyer details.
This clause may apply regardless of whether the marketing time has passed by the agent A.
Willing, ready and able
No sale, no cost is the norm in estate agencies. In the majority of no sale agreement, no fees in the event that your sale is not completed the sale, you do not pay any agent costs.
However, certain No sale, no fee agreements contain a’ready willing and capable clause. In this case, you’ll have to pay the agent’s fee, or a portion or a portion of that, when they present an interested buyer who is and willing to move forward even if you choose to pull out of the deal.
Which type of contract is more beneficial?
When you have multiple agencies, you’ll typically pay 1.5 percent plus VAT in fees than with a sole agency agreement.
Multi-agency advocates say the additional expense is justified due to the following reasons:
Your home will be noticed by more potential buyers
Whatever agent you select Your property will be advertised on major portals for property, including Rightmove, Zoopla and OnTheMarket. The majority of buyers begin their search for property using the portals.
The proponents of multi-agency argue that agents will own an own database of prospective buyers. They claim that agents will call their contacts prior to the information are printed. Agents could waste no time calling applicants but, in actuality the majority of applicants are registered with every agent in the region.
Certain agents are more adept in marketing
The quality of marketing among agents differs greatly. Agents upload hundreds of high-definition images as well as virtual tours of homes and detailed floor plans on the portals. Some offer fewer photos that are less high-quality and floor plans with no area.
If you select several agents, there’s more chance that one will show your home in a better way.
You can also examine how a prospective sole-agent shows a house before you make an appointment.
The competition leads to better offers
The theory suggests that multiple agents against one another will get higher bids from buyers.
In a seller’s market there are multiple agents who can be competitive with buyers one another, but neither can an individual agent. If a property is sought-after, a single agent could employ a variety of strategies like sealed bids or open houses to push the market.
In a market for buyers the presence of multiple agents fighting over a seller could cause a negative impression.
How numerous estate brokers should I employ?
A quick glance through the websites reveals that many properties are listed by several agents. Investors and developers particularly, prefer to market their properties through several agents. Do they have knowledge that private sellers do not?
The primary reason why some professional property owners use multi-agents is that they are clients who are frequent and are able to enjoy discounts. Being regular clients they can avail from the (debatable) advantages of multi-agency services without incurring any costs.
Potential buyers may find it frustrating and confusing to find the same property advertised by a variety of agents.
One of the main disadvantages of multiple-agency is that it appears to be a bit shabby, particularly when there are a lot of advertisements for sale on the outside of the property.
If buyers feel that you are desperate (or maybe that there’s something wrong on the property) they may be enticed to lower their offer.
A majority of sellers would prefer instructing the agent to work on a sole agency basis.
© Islington Stories 2025